Masonic Flag of Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy

Elder of Zion György Schwartz openly spends at least $2 million a year through his “Open Society” racket, as well as unknown millions in surreptitious support, trying to pave the way for Jewish control of Burma. The Saffron Revolution (Burma) is — in concert with Schwartz/CIA/MI6/Mossad/G2/UGLE/GOF’s Bulldozer Revolution (Serbia), 8888 Revolution (Burma), Otpor Revolution (Serbia), Rose Revolution (Georgia), Blue Revolution (Kuwait), Orange Revolution (Ukraine), Tulip Revolution (Kyrgyzstan), Quiet Revolution (Iran), Purple Revolution (Iraq), Zubr Revolution (Belarus), Grape Revolution (Moldova), Yellow Revolution (Mongolia), Cotton Revolution (Uzbekistan) and Jeans Revolution (Belarus) — making the world safe for Noachide Oligarchy.

Kim Kardashian wrote her whole thesis on the terrible situation in Burma

Belarus’ popular president Lukashenko has remarked:

“In our country, there will be no pink or orange, or even banana revolution.” … “They [the West] think that Belarus is ready for some ‘orange’ or, what is a rather frightening option, ‘blue’ or ‘cornflower blue’ revolution. Such ‘blue’ revolutions are the last thing we need”. … “All these coloured revolutions are pure and simple banditry.”

Of course Lukashenko has been called a tyrant and a dictator by the freedom-and-democracy-loving likes of Condoleezza Rice and Obongo Dunham-Davis-Soetero; and he faces arrest in Western Europe for having cracked down on foreign agents, because — unlike the West’s great liberal democratic allies in Libya, Red China, the Zionist Entity in Occupied Palestine, Egypt and Saudi Arabia — Lukashenko is not committed to “democracy” and “liberty”. The great Neo-Con propaganda outlet, Freedom House, in their 2007 list of the “least free” nations, ranks evil Belarus at the same level as Red China and Saudi Arabia:

Obama’s Masonic Pimp Chain from the Saudis

President Rahm & Puppet Obama with the Freedom-Lovin’ Saudis

Democratic Love-Fest of Democratic Democrats

Jews’ Puppet Democratically Tours the Capital of Democratic China

Naturally, the head of Elder Schwartz’s Burma Project is banned in Burma, and Elder Schwartz himself is unwelcome in neighboring Thailand, home to 2 million refugees who have fled the constant foreign-backed turmoil in Burma, and now destabilize Thailand. Thailand blames Elder Schwartz and his hedge fund for setting off the Asian financial crisis in July 1997, which started when the Thai baht plummeted. “Some get a little nervous to publicly have our support,” says Maureen Aung-Thwin, who heads the project out of a Fifth Avenue office in New York.

To bypass these petty nationalist anti-NWO concerns, Elder Schwartz’s Burma Project usually keeps a very low profile, employing just a few people on the ground in Thailand. It contributes to some 100 groups — “Civil Society”, “Pro-Democracy” and Jewman Rights front operations — and offers scores of academic scholarships to Burmese who might someday serve as useful puppets in a “democratic” Burma.

Aung-Thwin says the Burma Project racket keeps its recipients at arm’s length and makes sure they’re also getting funds from other organizations, so that few Thais even know the Burma Project exists. “We just don’t want to give any reason for attracting negative attention to our work,” she says. Under British rule, Burma was the richest country in South-East Asia. “British” interests were primarily represented in Burma by the Burmah Oil Company (BOC), which was founded in Glasgow in 1886 by David Sime Cargill and had a monopoly in Burma until 1901 when Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company began muzzling in. In 1909, BOC established the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (renamed Anglo-Iranian in 1935 and British Petroleum in 1954), an almost wholly-owned subsidiary. Difficulties over refining and transporting the Persian oil proved costly for BOC, and in 1912 the chairman, Sir John Cargill, son of the founder David Cargill, refused to finance Anglo-Persian any further. Winston Churchill had recently been appointed first lord of the Admiralty, and in 1914 the UK authorities and BOC concluded an agreement. The government acquired from the company a majority share in Anglo-Persian, and the Admiralty obtained long-term fuel oil supplies from Anglo-Persian. In 1923, the BOC bribed the psychopathic traitor and future Prime Minister Winston Churchill to lobby the British government to allow them to monopolise Persian oil resources. The company was involved in a landmark legal case, Burmah Oil Co. v Lord Advocate, concerning the destruction of oil fields in Burma by British forces. In 1966, Castrol was acquired by Burmah, which was renamed Burmah-Castrol. Rothschild’s Bank of England came to the rescue of Burmah Oil after the company made large losses on its tanker fleets in 1974. In 2000, Burmah-Castrol was acquired by BP Amoco (now renamed BP). Aung San Suu Kyi’s father supported the Japanese regime until he realized that Japan would lose the war to the Jew-Masonic UKUSSRUSA Internazis, and so switched to an alliance with the British-backed Communists. He was assassinated in 1947. Post-imperial Burma was subverted by Zionist-backed socialist forces, under U Nu. Elder of Zion David Gruen/”Ben Gurion” went on what he described as “a pilgrimage” to Burma in 1960, to visit puppet U Nu and “learn more about Buddhism.” Ethnic and religious tensions were exacerbated when U Nu made Buddhism the state religion as a way of limiting the influence of the Christian Chin, Karen, Lisu, Kachin, and Lahu peoples (as well as limiting the influence of the powerful KMT militias, many of whose leaders were Christian and intensely anti-Communist). U Nu was overthrown by Ne Win, and the “Burmese Way to Socialism” was instituted.

Moshe Dyan, Taking A Break From Murdering Palestinians

Elder of Zion Ben Gurion, On Pilgrimage

Mazel Tov!

The “Good Old Days” for Socialist Burma, with the Right Connections

In 2007, the Anglo-Jew-American regime attempted to introduce anti-Burmese resolutions at the UN Security Council, but was blocked by China, Russia and South Africa. Just days later, Burma granted China oil-and-gas exploration rights.

“Those are pretty formidable allies for the Burmese junta, to have both Russia and China protecting them,” said Aung-Thwin. “But we’re not daunted.”

Aung-Thwin has the support of the philosophers Jennifer Aniston, Woody Harrelson, Michael Stipe, Black-Eyed Fergie Pee-Pants, Sarah “Jews Killed Christ! Fuck Yeah! I’d Do It Again” Silverman, Julie Benz, Jason Schwartzman, Famke Janssen, Will Ferrell, Sylvester Stallone, Tila Tequila (Playboy’s first Asian Cyber Girl of the Month!), Jason Biggs, Sheryl Crow, Felicity Hoffman, Matisyahu, Kim Kardashian, and the sublime Steven Seagal. Many of them are arrogant Jew-bastards of course.

Elder Schwartz’s interest in Burma goes back to the fall of 1987, when millions of Burmese had taken to the streets to protest the regime’s decision to replace the nation’s currency, wiping out much of people’s savings. Elder Schwartz had started out working with the clique connected to the Zionist Adolf Eichmann in Hungary, but really made his bones as a Rothschild money manager. Using the same techniques he would eventually adopt in Hungary, Georgia, Belarus and other JWO-targeted nations, Elder Schwartz began in Burma, by searching for four useful “scholarship” recipients, and going on to develop a network of spies and other subversives. It should be understood, however, that many of Elder Schwartz’s agents are unaware of their role in destroying their own nations, but are step-by-step drawn into the movement through their obligations to their perverse “generous foreign benefactors.”

In the summer of 1988, after months of foreign-backed demonstrations, the Burmese military cracked down on the useful idiots. Tens of thousands of students and members of ethnic minorities began flooding across the Burma-Thailand border. Elder Schwartz launched the Burma Project in 1994. Some 30% of its money goes to JWO-education programs and university scholarships, the rest to grants for front groups. Recipients include the Alternate Asean Network on Burma, which issues reports on Burma; the National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma, Burma’s “government-in-exile”; and the Computer Network Training Program, which operate in the refugee camps. The Burma Project puts its money into “capacity building”, to use their jargon. This means that rather than provide food or water, it seeks to foster the economic, legal and media skills needed to run a country on JWO terms. Debbie Stothard, head of the Alternate Asean Network, rationalizes that her group does nothing to provide food or health care, because it is more useful to raise the refugees’ level of economic literacy and show them how to get what they are led to believe is their message out in the media. That means teaching about banking, taxation, and how governments can raise international loans to finance “development” on Josephite terms.

And Joseph situated his father and his brothers, and gave them a possession in the land of Egypt, in the best of the land, in the land of Rameses, as Pharaoh had commanded. Then Joseph provided his father, his brothers, and all his father’s household with bread, according to the number in their families.

Now there was no bread in all the land; for the famine was very severe, so that the land of Egypt and the land of Canaan languished because of the famine. And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan, for the grain which they bought; and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh’s house.

So when the money failed in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians came to Joseph and said, “Give us bread, for why should we die in your presence? For the money has failed.”

Then Joseph said, “Give your livestock, and I will give you bread for your livestock, if the money is gone.” So they brought their livestock to Joseph, and Joseph gave them bread in exchange for the horses, the flocks, the cattle of the herds, and for the donkeys. Thus he fed them with bread in exchange for all their livestock that year.

When that year had ended, they came to him the next year and said to him, “We will not hide from my lord that our money is gone; my lord also has our herds of livestock. There is nothing left in the sight of my lord but our bodies and our lands. Why should we die before your eyes, both we and our land? Buy us and our land for bread, and we and our land will be servants of Pharaoh; give us seed, that we may live and not die, that the land may not be desolate.”

Then Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for Pharaoh; for every man of the Egyptians sold his field, because the famine was severe upon them. So the land became Pharaoh’s. And as for the people, he moved them into the cities, from one end of the borders of Egypt to the other end. Only the land of the priests he did not buy; for the priests had rations allotted to them by Pharaoh, and they ate their rations which Pharaoh gave them; therefore they did not sell their lands.

Then Joseph said to the people, “Indeed I have bought you and your land this day for Pharaoh. Look, here is seed for you, and you shall sow the land. And it shall come to pass in the harvest that you shall give one-fifth to Pharaoh. Four-fifths shall be your own, as seed for the field and for your food, for those of your households and as food for your little ones.”

So they said, “You have saved our lives; let us find favor in the sight of my lord, and we will be Pharaoh’s servants.” And Joseph made it a law over the land of Egypt to this day, that Pharaoh should have one-fifth, except for the land of the priests only, which did not become Pharaoh’s.

So Israel dwelt in the land of Egypt, in the country of Goshen; and they had possessions there and grew and multiplied exceedingly.

One star pupil of Stothard and her Alternate Asean Network on Burma is Charm Tong, a 25-year-old advocate for the Shan minority in Burma who has met with President George W. Bush and spoken to the UN. “We’re always trying to build the new leaders; we call it the future of Burma,” says Aung-Thwin, who was raised in India. Aung-Thwin claims that, “each year, several hundred Soros scholarships are disbursed to Burmese students all over the world.” By “Soros”, Aung-Thwin means her master, the Elder of Zion Schwartz.

Aung-Thwin praises her sponsor, Elder Schwartz-Soros:

“The bulk of his work promoting open society focuses on Eastern Europe. Soros has keen antennae for dictatorships, and this was one he could not resist.”

David Mathieson, the Burma consultant for the Jew Bernstein and the Jew Roth’s Human Rights Watch, has taught English to refugees in the camps. Sometimes the Burma Project’s support is more administrative than “educational”, as shown by its work with the “National Coalition Government”, Burma’s shadow government, which was formed in Sweden, and now cools its heels under the nominal leadership of Aung San Suu Kyi’s cousin, Sein Win, in an office outside Washington, D.C., rent covered by Elder Schwartz-Soros at a cost of $85,000 a year. The NWO Burma Project endorses economic sanctions against resource-rich Burma, which is already one of the poorest countries in the world. Aung-Thwin explained why before the U.S. House of Representatives on June 10, 2003: “Sanctions offer economic, but also moral pressure.” Thant Myint-U, author of The River of Lost Footsteps: Histories of Burma, argues that after decades of war Burma needs more than just regime change; it needs to be rebuilt. “Isolating one of the most isolated countries in the world … is both counterproductive and dangerous,” he writes. Still, the project hasn’t come in for any of the attacks that Elder SchwartzSoros got for his role in destroying Eastern European and South Asian economies and his attempts to destabilize the pound sterling in order to “convince” Britons to adopt the Euro. Due to the Open Society’s failure so far in Burma, Aung-Thwin doesn’t usually measure progress toward a new government, but charts the development of her grantees. “The individuals we’ve supported, what do they continue to do?” she asks. “Do they go into non-governmental organizational work after they have American citizenship? How many go back to Thailand to work with compatriots and with refugees? That’s one of the ways that gratifies us.” The Weekly Standard‘s Neo-Jew-Con Communist Jewish Muslim writer Stephen Schwartz [a relative of Elder Schwartz-Soros?] wrote:

“Burma — like Georgia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzia before it — shows that the weak links in the global chain of tyranny are breaking, one by one, and that the worldwide movement for entrepreneurship, accountability, and popular sovereignty can assert itself, with or without the help of outsiders. For Americans and all haters of oppression, the message is clear: The United States should show effective support for the aspirations of Burma’s diverse citizens; tougher sanctions against the regime are only the beginning.”

Aung San Suu Kyi has been the most prominent Schwartz-NWO puppet. After attending universities in England (Oxford), Japan and India, and working for the United Nations and Bhutan’s Foreign Ministry, she was sent from London to Burma, and ended up under house arrest. She is viewed by many Burmese as possessing mystical powers, and is prayed to as a Buddhist quasi-deity. Others blame her Masonic party for much of Burma’s current distress economic state. The ruling junta derives much of its legitimacy from the military personality cult promoted by the likes of Aung San Suu Kyi’s father. Ironically, Aung San Suu Kyi may herself have little sympathy for the actions or attitudes of those who claim to support her. She has expressed skepticism of free markets as the cure-all for social and political ills. She believes that political reform will create economic reform, but the converse is not necessarily true. But who cares what “a symbol for democracy” actually thinks? Unlike her great champion, Elder Schwartz-Soros, she emphasizes a need for spiritual reform. Elder Schwartz-Soros would only care about spiritual reform if there were shekels to made from it. Oh, who knows what the truth is anymore? Black is white, up is down. Just a few decades ago, Bergen-Belsen was considered a holiday camp for privileged perverts and traitors; now we’re told it was hell on Earth! Who to believe? From the Jewish Virtual Museum:

“[Some] Jews [had] the privilege of being transported to the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp, where only those who had offered important services to the Germans could stay. There, their lives were not threatened, and they had everything in abundance […] They had all kinds of pleasures at their disposal, even sexual enjoyment. [...] the privileged Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp.”

Her Majesty Queen Rania Al Abdullah of Jordan, wrote that,

“[Aung San Suu Kyi's] small shoulders carry the weight of a restless nation who wait, with dignity, for her release. A woman whose vision and strength reach beyond her borders to embrace all those who believe in freedom and justice. You are not forgotten. We pray for your health and strength. We stand with you, Lady of the Lake.”

Fellow NWO illuminaries and mouthpieces have also campaigned for Elder Schwartz-Soros’ “Lady of the Lake, including Romano Prodi, Dora Bakoyannis (Greek Foreign Minister), Mary Robinson, Richard “Virgin” Branson, Jim “Rubber Face” Carrey, and the Dalai Bloody Lama. The great Liverpudlian philosopher Sir Paul McCartney has written that,

“Aung San Suu Kyi is an inspiration to her country and the rest of the world. I truly admire her infallible resolve and her determination to stand up for what she believes in. It is vital that Aung San Suu Kyi is released so that she can govern the people who elected her and give Burma back the freedom we all take for granted.”

A group of philosophers — many of them of a tribe allegedly Chosen by God — including George Clooney, Wes Anderson, Drew Barrymore, David Beckham, “Bono”, Matthew Broderick, Sandra Bullock, James Carville, the Jew Michael Chabon, Daniel Craig, John Cusack, Matt Damon, Robert De Niro, Dave Eggers, Jake Gyllenhaal, Václav Havel, Helen Hunt, Anjelica Huston, Scarlett Johansson, Nicole Kidman, Ashton Kutcher, Norman Lear, Madonna Ciccione, Mary Matalin, Sen. John McCain and his Mob Wife Cindy, Rose McGowan, Orhan Pamuk, Sarah Jessica Parker, Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, Brad Pitt, Julia Roberts, Robert Rodriguez, Meg Ryan, Liev Schreiber, Elder Shwartz-Soros, Steven Spielberg, Meryl Streep, Desmond Tutu, Naomi Watts, Hoaxico$ter Elie Wiesel, and Owen Wilson proclaimed:

“Now is the time for the international community to speak with one voice: Free Aung San Suu Kyi.”

Sir Bono wrote the following piece of garbage for ASSK:

Packing a suitcase for a place none of us has been

A place that has to be believed to be seen

You could have flown away

A singing bird in an open cage

Who will only fly, fly for freedom

Walk on, walk on

What you’ve got they can’t deny it

Can’t sell it, can’t buy it

Walk on, walk on

Stay safe tonight.

Yoko Ono wrote to ASSK:

“Your heart beats with my heart. My eyes see what you see. My belief is your belief. And my life is connected to thousands of universes, as is yours. Every twinkle of the star must travel billions of years to be seen by us. But our minds do not have to travel at all to be seen by each other. Because we are altogether.”

Awww, that’s lovely.

An open letter to Aung San Suu Kyi, from Forum 2000, May 2005:

At the beginning of the third millennium our global society is, thanks to modern technologies, able to easily communicate with anyone anywhere in the world. We are all becoming part of a larger spiritual dialogue that is further evolving our civilization.

Everyone has a right to become a meaningful and authentic part of this dialogue. Everyone has something to say and, in his or her own way, something to contribute. But you have been denied this basic right for a number of years. A great many believe you have been deprived of this basic right because your voice – gentle, gracious and inspirational – resonates with the undeniable and resolute force of truth; a truth that threatens those who deny your right to speak. Internationally, your voice has become an inspiration for civil society and it is a light in the darkness along the way to spiritual freedom.

People from all over the world write you letters and hold you in great esteem because you are a symbol of hope, courage and dignity. They write you even though they know their letters and words of hope may never reach you. History, however, has taught us that neither walls nor weapons can silence even the most isolated voice of courage and truth. Indeed, the efforts to silence such a voice only make it louder. Please know that we carry your voice in our hearts for all to hear.

Combating attempts, such as this one, to silence the truth is one of the reasons that we, the undersigned, along with others, have come together to form a collective effort known as Shared Concern Initiative. Shared Concern Initiative is an informal group of political, religious and intellectual leaders from around the world who, in the interest of good governance, tolerance and respect for human rights have dedicated themselves to address important challenges facing global society.

The first undertaking of Shared Concern Initiative is this open letter to you as a symbolic attempt to jointly break through the totalitarian barriers erected so unfairly around you.

With this letter also comes our humble invitation. We would be honoured if you joined us in the Shared Concern Initiative and in our effort to form a collective voice for truth, tolerance and transparency.

With deep respect,

• Václav Havel
• Michael Novak
• Mary Robinson
• George Soros
• André Glucksmann
• His Holiness Dalai Lama
• Karel Schwarzenberg
• Richard von Weizsäcker
• Vartan Gregorian
• Frederik Willem de Klerk
• Prince Hassan bin Talal
• Hans Küng
• Desmond Tutu

Desmond Tutu, Vaclav Havel, Gordon “Prudence” Brown, Stephen Fry, Eddie Izzard, Kevin Spacey, are twittering for ASSK! James Cameron, a great intellectual (by Canadian standards), wrote:

“Aung San Suu Kyi is a hero of mine because she stands up for human rights and dignity for the people of Burma, and for all people. I admire her because the heroes of many of the movies that I make [e.g. Piranha II: The Spawning, The Terminator, True Lies, Avatar] stand up against injustice. While my heroes are fictional, Aung San Suu Kyi is a real-life hero, and she needs help from you.”

Unelected British Prime Minister, Gordon “Prudence” Brown:

“I add my voice to the growing chorus of those demanding your release. For too long the world has failed to act in the face of this intolerable injustice. That is now changing. The clamour for your release is growing across Europe, Asia, and the entire world. We must do all we can to make this Birthday the last you spend without your freedom.”

So the beleaguered Burmese now find themselves in the same situation as Ukrainians and Finns in the 1930s, having to choose between Nazism or Internazism. Malaysia’s Ex-Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad initially supported Elder Schwartz-Soros’ economic interventions, until Elder Schwartz-Soros trashed the Malaysian currency to punish Malaysia for engaging in commerce with Burma. Elder Schwartz-Soros (quoted by Mark Baker, in The Age, June 7, 1997, and in Sydney Morning Herald, June 7, 1997):

“The decision by ASEAN foreign ministers to admit Burma as a full member next month in open defiance of the United States … is likely to seriously complicate ASEAN’s future relations with Europe and the US … It is the ASEAN leaders who now stand isolated and who, with their Burmese military cohorts, will be swept aside in the inexorable march of history.”

From a 1997 Fortune interview with Mahathir:

Mahathir: We have definite information that he is involved. Of course, he is not the only one. Others followed suit. But he started it. In fact, he more or less confessed later on that he was involved. He had this idea that by applying pressure on Thailand and Malaysia he could prevent Myanmar from joining ASEAN. We also know that on his staff he has a person from Myanmar who might be influencing him. We have every evidence that he is involved.

Fortune Magazine: Why do you oppose the activities of Mr. Soros’ Open Society regarding Myanmar?

Mahathir: We believe Myanmar should be given time to make the necessary adjustments. We never believe in applying pressure on people. Trying to starve a whole nation in order to force its government to behave, that is not our idea. If you want to act against the government, you act against the government…. You have to show them that the way others do things can bring benefits to the country without in any way undermining their authority. Even if they lose authority they’re not going to be thrown into jail. We have seen in some countries that when military authorities give up power in favor of democracy, and they happen to lose the election, they are thrown into jail. I mean that democracy is not any better than the dictatorship, because once you are elected to become the government you throw people into jail and then you say that you are a democracy. To me it doesn’t make sense.

Fortune: But hasn’t Myanmar’s military government put its political opponents under house arrest?

Mahathir: Yes, they put people under house arrest for this. In some countries people are executed, they are massacred as in Bosnia. What has the international community done? Nothing. [Here he's referring to the alleged anti-Muslim bias of the West, even though NATO went to war against the Orthodox Christians on behalf of the Muslims.] You know they sat there and saw people being slaughtered in front of their eyes, and they did nothing. So why should we accuse these people? She [Burmese political dissident Aung San Suu Kyi] is living comfortably in her own house. There are restrictions, of course. But it’s not as if she’s being strung up….

Fortune: There has been an anti-Semitic [sic] strain in the reporting on Mr. Soros in the Malaysian newspapers. What do you plan to do about that?

Mahathir: No, we are not anti-Semitic, because, as you know, the Arabs are also a Semitic people. We have always treated American Jews without any consideration at all that they are Jews. But when a person of Jewish origin does this kind of thing, the effect is the same as when a Muslim carries out something that is akin to terrorism. Immediately people link it to Islam, to Muslims, although generally Muslims do not behave like terrorists….People should stop accusing Muslims of being terrorists. People should not link Jews to these kinds of activities. Most Jews I think are quite innocent. They are not involved in this at all. But the impression created is of course that being Jewish they have lots of money. They know how to manipulate money as much as some people assume we Muslims naturally are terrorists, including myself….

Fortune: Are you worried that this quarrel you’ve had with Mr. Soros will deter foreign investors from coming to Malaysia?

Mahathir: We have no choice. He has wiped out billions of dollars from our economy, and if we’re going to sit by and say nothing in the hope that it will not deter investors, then we’re going to pay a very high price for those investments.

Fortune: If Mr. Soros were right here in front of you, what would you say to him?

Mahathir: Go somewhere else.

+ + +

Related:

CIA to Dish out $3 Million to buy silence in Another Narco Scandal By Sibel Edmonds, Boiling Frog Blog, 2009.11.17

The Mighty Agency on it’s Knees in a Legal Battle

After 15 years of legal battles the CIA agrees to pay $3 million to a former DEA agent who accused a former CIA official of illegally eavesdropping on him as part of a joint CIA and State Department effort to thwart DEA’s anti-narcotics mission in Burma in the early 1990s.

Richard Horn was stationed in Burma in the early 1990s as the DEA country attaché to Burma, a nation that is ranked as one of the top opium poppy producing countries in the world. He was in charge of overseeing DEA’s mission in Burma involving eradication of the opium poppy, which is used to produce heroin.

Bill Conroy of Narco News covers the latest on State Secrets Privilege recipient Richard Horn. As always Conroy dares to dig and cover this significant story when the rest of the media stenographers are avoiding it like the plague and as they are told by their mighty government sources above.

“The CIA’s efforts to undermine Horn’s work in Burma in getting that nation’s government to stem the flow of heroin to the United States should come as no surprise to those who are familiar with the “Agency’s” history. It seems the CIA, over the decades, has often found itself in the corner of narco-traffickers and thugs who support the Agency’s covert objectives in areas deemed critical to U.S. special interests – whether that be in Southeast Asia, Central Asia or Latin America.”

The CIA list of hotshots involved in the case includes former CIA Director George Tenet and recently retired Acting CIA General Counsel John Rizzo. Tenet and Rizzo played major roles in setting up the legal basis to justify the CIA’s use of torture. Here is Mr. Rizzo in action during the agency’s cover up operation on torture:

Conroy sums up the latest status of the case and the potential deserved sanctions that may be brought against Tenet, Rizzo, and other current and former CIA culprits:

And now, as part of the Horn case filed in a Washington D.C. federal court, we find a U.S. District judge, former FISA court member Royce Lamberth, opening the door for sanctions to be brought (as a result of the fraud, or lie, perpetrated on the court) against Tenet and Rizzo — as well as several other current and former CIA officials, among whom is Robert Eatinger, the current Acting Deputy General Counsel for Operations in the CIA’s Office of General Counsel (OGC).

If Lamberth’s judicial opinions in the Horn case are allowed to remain in the court record — to be recalled and cited going forward by other lawyers, judges and academics — then untold damage could be done to the reputation of the CIA and its leadership. Those judicial opinions memorializing the CIA’s fraud on the court also would serve as a permanent reminder of the occasionally dubious credibility of the Agency’s pronouncements invoking national security and the state-secrets privilege.

As part of this article Conroy provides a complete timeline and background on Horn’s case, involved CIA culprits, and of course, the mind-boggling and nauseating conclusions and implications. I highly encourage you to read Bill Conroy’s A+ piece. Afterwards we will have plenty to discuss over here, and plenty to show those who write off CIA’s long past and still present involvement in global Narco-Trafficking as fiction or conspiracy!